waterman, I agree the runoff is major contributor - and must be dealt with. So does restoring the bunker. To say its not the reduction fleets fault is correct - its partly there fault. They are one part of what has led to the issue of a dying watershed.Originally posted by waterman482:
yeah its the rduction fleets fault GET REAL buddy,i guess all of the runoff in the chesapeake watershed has nothing to do with it ot the overpopulation of the species,they need to cut it back or other specis #s are gonna start dropping
I couldn't agree more.People love to sensationalize. You have seen through their statistics. There are lies, damn lies, and STATISTICS!! And than you get a person trying to cause alarm, talking to a press writer, and voila...sh!t on a shingleOriginally posted by capt. ed:
the headline is very misleading. I would never downplay that fact, but to say 75% of our rockfish are diseased is a gross overstatement.
It most absolutely IS sensationalism, although we all agree it's alarming even at any level!Originally posted by dnik:
Jesus H Christ! Is this sensanionalism or fact.
can't eat chicken....bird flu
can't eat beef.... mad cow
can't eat most fish.... mercury
now my beloved bass glow in the dark!!
gimme a break