BASS BARN banner

1 - 20 of 84 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,018 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
Christine Ford’s new excuse for not testifying is, she wants the FBI to investigate Kavanaugh before she testifies.See: Christine Blasey Ford Wants F.B.I. to Investigate Kavanaugh Before She Testifies

Sept. 18, 2018


”Speaking through her lawyers, Christine Blasey Ford did not explicitly rule out appearing next Monday before the Senate Judiciary Committee to testify along with Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh. But echoing Senate Democrats, she said an investigation should be “the first step” before she is put “on national television to relive this traumatic and harrowing incident.”



But the real reason seems to be, her lawyer probably told her anyone who knowing lies to Congress, especially one who is under oath, is guilty of perjury and shall be fined or imprisoned up to five years,

JWK

The unavoidable truth is, the Bernie Sanders, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’, Andrew Gillum and Ayanna Pressley’s socialist plan for “free” college tuition will be paid for by taxing millions of college graduates who worked for and paid their own way through college and are now trying to finance their own economic needs.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
14,230 Posts
I say go through with the nomination she had her chance she could have said i need a week to get my act together but no besides the Dems will only ***** about it anyway along with other bull they can try to dig up.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
11,766 Posts
It's time to move forward with the nomination.

Ford had her chance to prove her claims, and obviously can not. She has contradicted herself on the incident, and even her eye witness has no recollection of it ever occurring. She has rightfully had her chance to testify under oath, and has refused, now its time to vote on the nomination.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
76,204 Posts
It's time to move forward with the nomination.

Ford had her chance to prove her claims, and obviously can not. She has contradicted herself on the incident, and even her eye witness has no recollection of it ever occurring. She has rightfully had her chance to testify under oath, and has refused, now its time to vote on the nomination.
agreed. The document release will over-shadow this in a week after his nomination is complete
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
11,766 Posts
Turns out Feinstein even doubts the Truthfulness of Christine Blasey Ford....

.....could it be more obvious that Dems are disgusting and dishonest people? They waited until the last minute to bring up this attack on Kavanaugh's character, and now Feinstein admits that she even questions the accuracy of the allegation.

"Senator Dianne Feinstein of California conceded Tuesday that she can’t attest to the veracity of Christine Blasey Ford’s allegation that Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her when they were in high school.
“[Ford] is a woman that has been, I think, profoundly impacted. On this . . . I can’t say that everything is truthful. I don’t know,” Feinstein told reporters on Capitol Hill when asked if she believed the allegation.

I hope the American people wake up on this issue, and the backlash against the Dems is enormous. Feinstein is a ....POS!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
11,766 Posts
The attempt to derail the nomination is failing....

....and it's going to be a great day for America!

Well....so far we have Christeene Blasey Ford not willing to show up to testify under oath for the alleged sexual harassment of 35 years ago

....and Ford’s lawyer, Katz, now saying it is not her job to corroborate her client’s claim against Kavanaugh.

....and we have the righteous Sen Feinstein, who now questions the accuracy of the allegation - that she leveled against Kavanaugh - disgusting

....and we have a 'witness named by Ford', who says it never happened !

Most importantly, I believe the nomination is back on track and will be scheduled for vote shortly

What we have here folks is a cheap drive-by character assassination. Dems don't care that they have no proof, they don't care about Kavanaughs family or career, and they don't care about justice. This is a low life attempt to derail the nomination of a qualified candidate.

I wish Kavanaugh would sue all three for defamation of character!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,936 Posts
For anyone who has been deposed to testify, lawyers will train, train, train, you on Q&A and it does take more then a day or two. They should stick with Monday and be done, either she shows up, or get the heck out and stop "meddling " in this nomination.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,737 Posts
Christine Ford’s new excuse for not testifying is, she wants the FBI to investigate Kavanaugh before she testifies.See: Christine Blasey Ford Wants F.B.I. to Investigate Kavanaugh Before She Testifies

Sept. 18, 2018


”Speaking through her lawyers, Christine Blasey Ford did not explicitly rule out appearing next Monday before the Senate Judiciary Committee to testify along with Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh. But echoing Senate Democrats, she said an investigation should be “the first step” before she is put “on national television to relive this traumatic and harrowing incident.”



But the real reason seems to be, her lawyer probably told her anyone who knowing lies to Congress, especially one who is under oath, is guilty of perjury and shall be fined or imprisoned up to five years,

JWK

The unavoidable truth is, the Bernie Sanders, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’, Andrew Gillum and Ayanna Pressley’s socialist plan for “free” college tuition will be paid for by taxing millions of college graduates who worked for and paid their own way through college and are now trying to finance their own economic needs.
Lying under oath cuts both ways. In fairness to her she disclosed this to friends and counselors long before Kavanaugh was nominated. Also remember Kanvanaugh was the party animal in HS and college days. But it is unfortunate for this to come up this far along in life.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
14,230 Posts
Franks Seaswirl In fairness to her she disclosed this to friends and counselors long before Kavanaugh was nominated

Not to mention she has been protesting against Trump since prior to his election only shows how much hate she has towards him and the Republicans so there has been plenty of time to come up with a last minute attempt to put the screws to Trump
:naughty:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,665 Posts
For anyone who has been deposed to testify, lawyers will train, train, train, you on Q&A and it does take more then a day or two. They should stick with Monday and be done, either she shows up, or get the heck out and stop "meddling " in this nomination.
Like clockwork moderate republican to the rescue.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
11,766 Posts
Lying under oath cuts both ways. In fairness to her she disclosed this to friends and counselors long before Kavanaugh was nominated. Also remember Kanvanaugh was the party animal in HS and college days. But it is unfortunate for this to come up this far along in life.
"In fairness"... I laugh whenever you start a post with this, so let's be specific....

She disclosed this to counselors in a group therapy session in 2012 - 30 years after the alleged incident. Ironically, it was prior to the 2012 election when it looked like Romney would win, and reports indicated he would nominate Kavanaugh to SC. When Romney didn't win, she did nothing with her allegation. She is a known supporter of the far left.
Coincidence.....we are each left to judge for ourselves.

As far as disclosing to friends....Now two witnesses 'who's names she provided', and are alleged by her to have been at this 'party', deny that they or Kavanaugh were even there. Another woman from HS came out yesterday and said she 'heard something' in HS, but was not there, and therefore took down her comment on Social Media.
In contrast, at last count there were many women who knew Kavanaugh in HS - some of which he dated, and who have come forward in writing to attest to his character and specifically his treatment of women.

I have not read a single article indicating Kavanaugh was 'the party animal' in HS, as you claim. In fairness.....please post them up to support your assertion.

Did it happen?....I don't know, but we need evidence that it did. If evidence is not demanded to determine validity of allegations, any of us can have our lives and careers ruined at any time - just because someone doesn't like us, or our politics.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,018 Posts
Discussion Starter #15
and Kavanaugh has already testified under oath

Exactly! And, has been investigated by the FBI six freaken times!


JWK

The Democrat Leaders promise for free cheese doesn’t work in Cuba, doesn’t work in Venezuela ___ it only works for corrupted politicians who confiscate and then redistribute “free cheese” in order to buy votes and remain in power.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
672 Posts
Seems to me this is just another wingnut stall tactic from lefty. Their temper tantrum is not worthy of any more attention than what is given to any two year old throwing a fit.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,029 Posts
Lying under oath cuts both ways. In fairness to her she disclosed this to friends and counselors long before Kavanaugh was nominated. Also remember Kanvanaugh was the party animal in HS and college days. But it is unfortunate for this to come up this far along in life.
I find it incredible how you state things as fact, when there is little or no evidence as to Dr. Ford disclosing this to friends and counselors long before Kavanaugh was nominated. I can only comment on what I have heard through the media:

1. Dr. Ford apparently recalled parts of the alleged incident while undergoing some type of counseling accompanied by her husband in 2012.

2. There was a Twitter post by a former classmate that stated something to the effect that she remembers Dr. Ford talking about the incident during school, at the time. This contradicts what the Doctor has reportedly said occurred during the summer, ostensibly when she was not in school. The person that posted her comments has deleted her Tweets and closed her account.

Another former classmate of the Doctor has stated that she was contacted by the Doctor two or three months ago, and the Doctor asked her if she recalled her relating the story of the incident at the time. The classmate indicates that she told her that she did not. This presents a possibility that Dr. Ford, a psychologist, was using this technique to plant an idea in the classmates head. This is also inconsistent with the position that has been presented by Senator Feinstein and the attorneys for the Doctor that she did not want to go on the record with her allegation, which suggests that they were hoping that the mere allegation would be enough to derail the nomination.

3. Dr. Ford identified at least two of the four people at the alleged party, one boy that was present in the room and jumped on top of both Judge Kavanaugh and herself and knocked them off the bed, and another boy who attended the party. The person who allegedly jumped on the bed says he has no recollection of the party described. The other person at the party says he has no recollection of such a party.


I have seen no reports of anyone else saying that they have a recollection of Dr. Ford talking about the alleged groping until 2012 during counseling.

As for "party animal", I do not believe that is a very specific description of anything, and by being called one does not make one guilty of anything, nor does support any allegation of sexual misconduct. If someone likes sex, does it mean that they will be involved with sexual misconduct - of course not. Similarly if a person likes to party, it has no bearing on the inclination of being involved with sexual misconduct.

What IS wrong, is that this was brought up after Judge Kavanaugh completed the hearings, despite Senator Feinstein having the information. Also wrong is that the Republicans only received a redacted copy of the letter from Dr. Ford after the hearings.

These allegations cannot be proven to be true, or false, so calling in the FBI is just a stalling tactic. Also Kavanaugh has had at least six FBI background checks and all have come back without negative information and he was confirmed on at least two occasions. Apparently, this was referred to the FBI by Senator Feinstein recently, and they would not entertain it. My guess is that she is trying to hand off the "hot potato" of her own making in the way she handled the allegation.

It appears to me, that the Kavanaugh hearings went well and he was on track to be confirmed by a vote that would put several Democrat Senators in a bind that are running for re-election in states that President Trump won during his election. This is an attempt to upset the trajectory that was taking place to give the Dems another shot at prevailing in their "Resist" nonsense, by unfairly inserting hearsay and innuendo in trying to create public outcry to put pressure on the Republicans to waiver in their support.

Luckily, the Republicans seem to be handling this fairly well, given the circumstances.

Nonetheless, Judge Kavanaugh has an unblemished history of judicial opinions including 12 on the Circuit Court of Appeals in Washington, DC, and that is the main factual information to consider.
 

·
Administrator
Joined
·
49,981 Posts
Should Booker now recuse himself from the Judiciary Comittee :huh:

“New Year’s Eve 1984,” Booker recalled. “I will never forget. I was 15. As the ball dropped, I leaned over to hug a friend and she met me instead with an overwhelming kiss.”


"Game on"


“As we fumbled upon the bed, I remember debating my next ‘move’ as if it were a chess game. With the ‘Top Gun’ slogan ringing in my head, I slowly reached for her breast. After having my hand pushed away once, I reached my ‘mark,’” Booker wrote.


“Our grouping ended soon and no ‘relationship’ ensued, she told me she was drunk that night and didn’t really know what she was doing.”


“Ever since puberty, I remember receiving messages that sex was a game, a competition. Sexual relations were best achieved through luck, guile, strategy or coercion.”


Booker wrote about how alcohol lubricated those relations:

“‘With liquor you’ll get to bed quicker,’ … ‘What do you think happened? She invited me back to her room at 3 a.m.’ … ‘I’ve got to find a way to snatch that snatch.’ … ‘The best thing for that girl would be to be tied down and screwed.’”

 

·
Registered
Joined
·
11,766 Posts
Should Booker now recuse himself from the Judiciary Comittee :huh:

“New Year’s Eve 1984,” Booker recalled. “I will never forget. I was 15. As the ball dropped, I leaned over to hug a friend and he met me instead with an overwhelming kiss.”

"Game on"

“As we fumbled upon the bed, I remember debating my next ‘move’ as if it were a chess game. With the ‘Top Gun’ slogan ringing in my head, I slowly reached for his pidorkus. After having my hand pushed away once, I yelled "I am Spartacus" and reached my ‘mark,’” Booker wrote.

“Our grouping ended soon and no ‘relationship’ ensued,
Fixed it for you :D
 
1 - 20 of 84 Posts
Top