BASS BARN banner
1 - 11 of 11 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,558 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·

NJ MOVES FORWARD WITH 2010 SALTWATER REGULATIONS

Marine Fisheries Council Makes Bid To Avoid Shark Fishing Ban




The New Jersey Marine Fisheries Council (Council) met this past Thursday night in the Toms River Township Office (moved from the normal meeting location of Galloway, NJ to accommodate the anticipated large crowd) for their March meeting. Of primary interest to recreational anglers was the specifications setting for the 2010 seasons for black sea bass, summer flounder and weakfish. Also of interest to recreational anglers under other business was pending regulatory changes to the Coastal Sharks Management Plan. As anticipated, public turnout was high.

For the 2010 season, the Council enacted the following measures: Summer Flounder - Six fish, 18" min. size (Open May 29 - September 6)
Black Sea Bass - 25 fish, 12.5" min. size (Open May 22 - August 8, and September 4 - October 4; or final season determined by the ASMFC.)
Weakfish - One fish, 13" min. size (No Closed Season)

Given 12 options for summer flounder that had been approved by the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission (ASMFC) as "conservationally equivalent" from which to choose, there was overwhelming support in the room for the option selected after hearing a report from the Council's Committee recommending Option 1. "There's no good option," commented Capt. Tony Bogan, a Board member of the Recreational Fishing Alliance New Jersey Chapter (RFA-NJ). "All you have to do, is look at the state of New York to see the devastating effect constantly going up in size to extend the season has on regulations," said Capt. Bogan, referring to New York's 21.5-inch minimum size and season which is one of the shortest on the East Coast. Option 1 retains the 2009 size and bag limit, while including both the Memorial and Labor Day holidays. Surf fishermen did have their say noting their desire to extend the season as long as possible.

The black sea bass final regulation may remain in limbo until May. "The National Marine Fisheries Service will issue a proposed rule in March," commented RFA-NJ Chairman Capt. Adam Nowalsky. "A final rule is not likely to be promulgated until possibly as late as May." At issue is the wave 5 recreational landings report for the period of September and October of 2009. Typically available within 45 days of the end of the wave, there are issues with the 2009 data during this period resulting in an extensive evaluation of the calculations with final numbers not likely until mid-April. A required 44% reduction reflected in the specified season is the result of current projections claiming the coast doubled landings of black sea bass during wave 5 of 2009 over the same period in 2008.

Nowalksy explains that these same projections were used for wave 6 (November/December), but have since proven inaccurate as landings from that period in the Mid-Atlantic came in some 80% below landings from the same period the previous year. "The RFA will continue to address the issue of these projections to continue to lower any required reductions for 2010," said Capt. Nowalsky.
The Council had little option in recommending the weakfish regulations that drop the bag limit to only a single fish. This change was mandated by the ASMFC. Stocks of weakfish are known to be in major decline, however recruitment and the young-of-the-year index both remain high, indicating the rate of reproduction of weakfish remains high. As these fish migrate south for the winter, they are seemingly being subject to a natural mortality outside of fishing pressure, and not allowing anglers to see larger fish each successive year.
On the issue of coastal sharks, the Council moved forward with approving measures to bring the state in compliance with the ASMFC Interstate Coastal Sharks Fishery Management Plan. Recently found to be out of compliance with the plan, New Jersey's anglers face a potential moratorium during the coming season. One of the major hurdles cleared was a closure of Large Coastal Sharks (bull, hammerheads, nurse, sandbar, tiger, et. al.) during the spring "pupping" season. New Jersey's recreational anglers primarily target mako, thresher and blue sharks which are labeled Pelagic Sharks, to which the "pupping" closure would not apply. New Jersey submitted a timeline for compliance to the Dept. of Commerce and expects to hear word next week whether a moratorium will be imposed on the state's fishery for 2010. The RFA-NJ submitted a letter as part of the state's efforts to avoid a moratorium.
One final motion by the Council made by Councilman (and RFA-NJ Board member) Ed Goldman was to draft a resolution supporting the Flexibility in Rebuilding American Fisheries bills currently in the US House and Senate. The motion, as expected, passed. "We look forward to the Council's continued support on this and other issues such as MRFSS and upcoming Accountability Measures, which could subject every recreational fishery to in-season closures based on the unreliable MRFSS data," commented Capt. Nowalsky.
RFA-NJ Board members were there representing New Jersey's recreational saltwater fishermen and gave extensive public comment on the issues through the evening.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
154 Posts
Block

Thanks for the info. I'm perplexed as to why a total moritorium on weakfish was not instituted:confused:. Why would one spend money on bait and gas for one fish per man ???

I'm with you on this one 100%; they need to just totaly close it down like they did with the Stripers back in the 70s until there is a major rebound if ever. I just hope they close down the commercial folks too or this (one fish deal) is never going to help.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,431 Posts
I'm with you on this one 100%; they need to just totaly close it down like they did with the Stripers back in the 70s until there is a major rebound if ever. I just hope they close down the commercial folks too or this (one fish deal) is never going to help.
It will never work if they dont shut down commericals:naughty:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,218 Posts
Complete moratorium on weakfish at this point up and down the east coast gets my vote. For those knowing what it feels like to catch a tide-runner, I think most would agree. It's time... Looks like I won't be targeting weakfish this season. One at 13" is just not worth the hassle. Hopefully the bigger croakers will come in this year.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,558 Posts
Discussion Starter · #8 ·
Block

Thanks for the info. I'm perplexed as to why a total moratorium on weakfish was not instituted:confused:. Why would one spend money on bait and gas for one fish per man ???
I think everyone would agree that they should of, would of, could of, put a total moratorium on weakfish. Why they did not close it down completely I do not know.:huh: Maybe they will shut it down next year if the data has not improved. ASMFC says the weakfish are not being over fished.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
219 Posts
Going back to the thread about the Weakfish biomass . . someone aptly pointed out that they need to study the entire biomass of the bay and other habitat to figure out what is going on with the weakfish. Not that I fish the bay NEARLY as much as I used to . . but I see other changes too since the days of the Tiderunner. LOTS more sharks of different species then I remember back then. And not that I ever thought I'd be sad about this (not really . . just something I've noticed) but there seems to be a lot less Oyster Crackers too. Is that just do to having so many less active Oyster beds in the bay? Something else? Related to less weakfish? Or just my imagination. We used to joke that you had to catch 3 toadfish before you were allowed to catch a weakfish.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
794 Posts
It was done in order to...

I think everyone would agree that they should of, would of, could of, put a total moratorium on weakfish. Why they did not close it down completely I do not know.:huh: Maybe they will shut it down next year if the data has not improved. ASMFC says the weakfish are not being over fished.
...dissuade any keeper catch in numbers, but what if you catch say one nice 20-25 inch class/tide-runner type you will get to keep it...Ok by me as long as they stopped the major impact including Netting Commercially.:bow: which was reduced to a minimum level bycatch also utilizing unrealistic cost factor target ratios commercially. This should have a more positive effect than the way it was :wave:at least we're all hoping it will.
 
1 - 11 of 11 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top