Yeah, since you didn't get yours yet it must be a conspiracy
I find it funny that JCAA claims 100% of their clubs voted fror 2 @ 28", when I know of 2 clubs that did not vote. They should have said 100% of the clubs that actually voted, because I know both Fortescue and Cape May did NOT vote for 2 @ 28". Additionally, it's quite amusing how it is portrayed by JCAA that 100% of their clubs want 2 @ 28". WHile the club presidents may have voted for that option, there is not even an inkling from JCAA that there is even a minority that did not want 2 @ 28", which is of course a joke. If you listen to them it's evereybody, without exception. Of course, there is no proof of that since they don't poll the individual club members, just the club presidents. The clubs may vote in favor (and no one knows if every club member was present since there is no poll lik RFA) b ut that could easily be a 51% to 49% majority. While that would still be a majority for JCAA's vote, it certainly would no longer look like the overwhelming number of people and everyone except RFA members wanted 2 @ 28". RFA's last poll proved that more than half of those that responded did not want 2 @ 28". If we knew how many JCAA members wanted something else the picture would be far clearer, but that does not suit Tom's purposes in this instance.