BASS BARN banner

1 - 20 of 72 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,038 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
Senator Lindsey Graham: “We’ve Got the Votes to Confirm the Justice on the Floor of the Senate BEFORE the Election”


Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) joined Sean Hannity on Monday night.
During their discussion Graham said the Republicans have 50 votes to confirm the next Supreme Court Justice on the floor of the US Senate before the November election!

Senator Cory Gardner (R-CO) announced Monday he would vote for a GOP nominee before the election. Senator Grassley from Iowa also said he would vote for a Trump nominee for the highest court.
Senator Graham: “We’ve got the votes to confirm the Justice on the floor of the Senate BEFORE the election & that’s what is coming.”

Via The Columbia Bugle:

Senator Lindsey Graham Announcing On Hannity That They Have The Votes For Trump’s SCOTUS Pick

“We’ve got the votes to confirm the Justice on the floor of the Senate BEFORE the election & that’s what is coming.” pic.twitter.com/L1Nwr1wBjd

— The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸 (@ColumbiaBugle) September 22, 2020

More from Charlie Kirk:

BREAKING:

According to Lindsey Graham, Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee “We’ve got the votes to confirm Justice Ginsburg’s replacement before the election.

That’s what’s coming.”

FILL. THE. SEAT.
— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) September 22, 2020

.


 

·
Registered
Joined
·
74,340 Posts
What is the earliest they can approve?
 

·
Administrator
Joined
·
49,123 Posts
What is the earliest they can approve?
The dems will demand some hearings so they can engage in some Godd Old Fashioned CATHOLIC BASHING first

The dems will demand some hearings so they can engage in some Godd Old Fashioned CATHOLIC BASHING first
But that is not required. They can just vote on the floor and they should do it. Do you want to see Kamaletoe opinioning her thoughts to the pick? Hell no. I think this is a win for Trump and the R's. It will give the "moderate rs":rolleyes:, never trumpers, and the precious independent voters a good choice why to vote for Trump. He is keeping the court leaning right.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
24,409 Posts
The dems will demand some hearings so they can engage in some Godd Old Fashioned CATHOLIC BASHING first
But that is not required. They can just vote on the floor and they should do it. Do you want to see Kamaletoe opinioning her thoughts to the pick? Hell no. I think this is a win for Trump and the R's. It will give the "moderate rs":rolleyes:, never trumpers, and the precious independent voters a good choice why to vote for Trump. He is keeping the court leaning right.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
74,340 Posts
But that is not required. They can just vote on the floor and they should do it. Do you want to see Kamaletoe opinioning her thoughts to the pick? Hell no. I think this is a win for Trump and the R's. It will give the "moderate rs":rolleyes:, never trumpers, and the precious independent voters a good choice why to vote for Trump. He is keeping the court leaning right.
Agreed. Push it through as fast as possible causing the Dims as much angst as possible:D
 

·
Administrator
Joined
·
49,123 Posts
But that is not required. They can just vote on the floor and they should do it. Do you want to see Kamaletoe opinioning her thoughts to the pick? Hell no. I think this is a win for Trump and the R's. It will give the "moderate rs":rolleyes:, never trumpers, and the precious independent voters a good choice why to vote for Trump. He is keeping the court leaning right.

True, but they will need to get thru some procedural hurddles to make it to the floor .
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
24,409 Posts
True, but they will need to get thru some procedural hurddles to make it to the floor .
Correct.

Romney just announced he is going to vote for Trumps pick. :thumbsup: I assumed that he would be a no. Murkowski and Collins should do a Obama and vote present. That way they voted their principle and they would not put in danger to Trumps pick.
 

·
Administrator
Joined
·
49,123 Posts
Correct.

Romney just announced he is going to vote for Trumps pick. :thumbsup: I assumed that he would be a no. Murkowski and Collins should do a Obama and vote present. That way they voted their principle and they would not put in danger to Trumps pick.

I'd pick Barbara Lagoa at this point in time , and save Barrett for the second term.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,466 Posts
Senator Lindsey Graham: “We’ve Got the Votes to Confirm the Justice on the Floor of the Senate BEFORE the Election”


Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) joined Sean Hannity on Monday night.
During their discussion Graham said the Republicans have 50 votes to confirm the next Supreme Court Justice on the floor of the US Senate before the November election!

Senator Cory Gardner (R-CO) announced Monday he would vote for a GOP nominee before the election. Senator Grassley from Iowa also said he would vote for a Trump nominee for the highest court.
Senator Graham: “We’ve got the votes to confirm the Justice on the floor of the Senate BEFORE the election & that’s what is coming.”

Via The Columbia Bugle:

Senator Lindsey Graham Announcing On Hannity That They Have The Votes For Trump’s SCOTUS Pick

“We’ve got the votes to confirm the Justice on the floor of the Senate BEFORE the election & that’s what is coming.” pic.twitter.com/L1Nwr1wBjd

— The Columbia Bugle  (@ColumbiaBugle) September 22, 2020

More from Charlie Kirk:

BREAKING:

According to Lindsey Graham, Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee “We’ve got the votes to confirm Justice Ginsburg’s replacement before the election.

That’s what’s coming.”

FILL. THE. SEAT.
— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) September 22, 2020

.


These are strange comments coming from senators. They don't know who the candidate is, the person has not been vetted, they have not had a hearing to hear to prospective judges views, But they have votes already?

So there is no process if votes have been predetermined. Its just ugly politics. Some of these senators who are committed to vote already are in danger of being voted out already. This may be their nail in the coffin.
 

·
Administrator
Joined
·
49,123 Posts
These are strange comments coming from senators. They don't know who the candidate is, the person has not been vetted, they have not had a hearing to hear to prospective judges views, But they have votes already?

So there is no process if votes have been predetermined. Its just ugly politics. Some of these senators who are committed to vote already are in danger of being voted out already. This may be their nail in the coffin.

The process is , Nomination then senate vote , all the rest is fluff and fanfare , none of it is required.

Now you claim they have not been vetted , well the top to judges in the running for nomination are :

Barbara Lagoa is a United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.

Amy Vivian Coney Barrett United States circuit judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit


both are currently sitting on the bench and both have been properly vetted thru the Senate process , no need to do it twice
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
31,586 Posts
These are strange comments coming from senators. They don't know who the candidate is, the person has not been vetted, they have not had a hearing to hear to prospective judges views, But they have votes already?

So there is no process if votes have been predetermined. Its just ugly politics. Some of these senators who are committed to vote already are in danger of being voted out already. This may be their nail in the coffin.
Do you want a liberal justice on the court?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,892 Posts
Last I checked President Trump has posted the names of people he would pick from, so it is not as though the Senate is not aware of potential candidates.

Perhaps this is more of a response to the Dems gambit of claiming that since it is an election year, the nomination should until the new president is in office. Needless to say this is nonsense. They try to claim that the decision by the Republican-controlled Senate not to hold hearings for Obama nominee Merrick Garland somehow sets precedent for the current situation is hogwash. It is the prerogative of the Senate to hold hearings to further a nomination, or not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fran

·
Administrator
Joined
·
49,123 Posts
These are strange comments coming from senators. They don't know who the candidate is, the person has not been vetted, they have not had a hearing to hear to prospective judges views,

Judge Lagoa is one possible pick, She was confirmed less than one year ago , actually just 10 Months ago by the same senators that will vote now , 10 Months ago she was confirmed by a vote of 80–15

would not the same senators that voted 80-15 just 10 months ago have the same confidence and vote the same way again ?

 

·
Registered
Joined
·
22,002 Posts
Do you want a liberal justice on the court?

He has enough froth in his mouth and hatred for President Trump that he wants anyone except a President Trump choice. However he will have to keep the froth and hatred.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,304 Posts
These are strange comments coming from senators. They don't know who the candidate is, the person has not been vetted, they have not had a hearing to hear to prospective judges views, But they have votes already?

So there is no process if votes have been predetermined. Its just ugly politics. Some of these senators who are committed to vote already are in danger of being voted out already. This may be their nail in the coffin.
You seem to have plenty of opinions except when it comes to Biden's first wife and the car accident huh.... :huh: Francesca the FRAUD :thumbsup:
 
1 - 20 of 72 Posts
Top